部分详细内容仅提供韩文版本。

Asset Classes6 分钟阅读

The Risks of Structured Products (ELS/DLS) — The Trap of Conditional Payoffs

'6% annual return, low chance of principal loss.' Have you ever been pitched such a product at a bank counter? Structured products like ELS hide the premise of 'if the conditions are met.'

What Are Structured Products

Structured products are financial products whose payoff is set 'conditionally' according to the movement of an underlying asset (a stock index, individual stock, commodity, and so on).

The representative ones are ELS (equity-linked securities) and DLS (derivative-linked securities). ELS are based on stock indexes or stocks, DLS on interest rates, exchange rates, commodities, and the like.

The typical structure goes: 'If the underlying doesn't fall below a certain level, it pays the promised return; if it falls below a specific line (the knock-in), a principal loss occurs.'

In other words, in normal times it looks like a higher return than a deposit, but if the conditions are broken, an asymmetric structure produces a large loss.

Knock-In — the Trigger of Loss

The core of a structured product is the knock-in condition. When the underlying falls below a certain proportion of the initial reference price (often around 50%), the 'knock-in' triggers and it enters the principal-loss zone.

The problem is that this structure is designed for 'small gains, rare but large losses.' In most cases you receive the promised return, but on the rare occasion a large decline comes, the loss is large.

In other words, even if the probability looks low, it carries a 'tail risk' where, once it goes off, the loss can reach more than half of your principal. If you trust only the explanation that 'the chance of principal loss is low,' it's easy to miss this tail.

The 2024 Hong Kong H-Index ELS Episode

The representative case where this risk became reality is the 2024 Hong Kong H-Index (HSCEI) ELS episode in Korea.

The H-Index rose to about 12,230 in February 2021 and then plunged to about 5,481 in January 2024. Three-year-maturity ELS products bought near the peak three years earlier hit knock-ins and maturities en masse, locking in losses.

Of the roughly 435.3 billion won that matured in the first three weeks of January 2024, banks repaid only about 257.5 billion won, so the average loss rate reached about 52.7%. The total H-Index ELS sold by banks was about 18.8 trillion won, and the 2024 loss was estimated at up to about 6 trillion won.

Financial authorities, citing incomplete sales, signaled about 2 trillion won in penalties and the like against five banks.

The 'H-Index about 12,230 in Feb 2021 → about 5,481 in Jan 2024,' 'average loss rate of about 52.7% on maturities in the first three weeks of January 2024,' and 'total sales of about 18.8 trillion won, estimated losses of up to about 6 trillion won' were cross-checked against KED Global, the Korea Herald, and JoongAng Daily reporting. Loss estimates may vary by point in time and basis of tally.

Look at the 'Conditions' Behind the High Interest Rate

The lesson of the ELS/DLS episodes is clear. Behind the surface of 'a higher return than a deposit' there is always 'under what conditions you lose your principal.'

If you enroll for the reason that 'the rate is high,' without understanding the knock-in level, the underlying's volatility, and the scenarios to maturity, you take on the tail of a rare but large loss.

As this service emphasizes, for any product you must weigh not just the 'expected return' but also how much you could lose in the worst case (the maximum loss). Especially with complex structures, you must be able to understand the conditions inside them yourself.

常见问题

Q. Is an ELS a principal-guaranteed product?

Most ELS are principal 'non-guaranteed' products. If the underlying falls below the knock-in level (often about 50% of the initial), a principal loss occurs. In the 2024 Hong Kong H-Index ELS episode, the average loss rate on maturing products reached about 52.7%. 'A low chance of principal loss' and 'principal guaranteed' are entirely different statements.

Q. Why does it pay higher interest than a deposit?

The high offered yield is the price of taking on 'conditional risk.' Because the investor takes on the risk of losing principal if the underlying falls sharply, a higher return than a deposit is offered as compensation. The principle that there is no high return without risk in this world applies here just the same.

📋 结果基于历史数据计算,过去的收益不代表未来的收益。

📋 本服务旨在帮助理解投资、供教育之用,并非投资建议。