Parte del contenido detallado solo está disponible en coreano.

📖 Historias de inversión

Deposits vs. stocks: a 20-year gap

This compares the estimated results of a 3%-a-year deposit and an S&P 500 ETF when investing about $370 every month for 20 years. See the difference in volatility and opportunity cost for yourself.

Resumen de las condiciones de inversión

Periodo

Jan 2006 – Jan 2026 (20 years)

Importe

about $370 / month

Activo

3%/yr deposit vs. S&P 500 ETF (USD basis)

Método

Paid in at each month-end

⚠️ Todos los resultados de abajo son estimaciones basadas en datos pasados y se muestran antes de impuestos. Reflejar comisiones, tipos de cambio e impuestos puede hacer que los resultados reales difieran.

Total principal paid in

about $89k

20 years × 12 months × ~$370

Deposit estimated result (after-tax approx.)

about $121k

~3%/yr simple/compound approximation, interest-income tax applied

S&P 500 estimated result (estimate, pre-tax)

about $333k

FX effect not reflected, pre-tax, fees not reflected (estimate)

Difference between the two (pre-tax basis)

about $212k difference

The S&P 500 after-tax result is lower

MDD

Periodo de máxima caída: Oct 2007 – Mar 2009

-56.8% (S&P 500 basis)

Unos 52 meses para recuperarse

The key test of the 20-year S&P 500 investment. Whether you stayed invested through this stretch decides the 20-year result. The deposit's principal was protected even during this period.

Deposits vs. stocks: the difference in numbers

Assuming you pay in about $370 every month for 20 years, the total principal is about $89k.

A 3%-a-year deposit (compounded) is estimated at around $121k. That is about $32k of gain over the principal, but it shrinks further once interest-income tax is paid.

Had you made recurring investments in an S&P 500 ETF, the estimated final amount is about $333k (pre-tax, FX effect not reflected). On a pre-tax basis, that is about $212k more than the deposit.

But this comparison assumes you endured the -56.8% (financial crisis) and -33.9% (COVID) crashes over the S&P 500's 20-year journey. A deposit has none of that fear.

Enduring volatility is the precondition

That the stock result is far larger than the deposit is clear from simple numbers. But to actually experience that difference, you had to endure countless bouts of volatility, including two big crashes (the 2008 financial crisis and the 2020 COVID crash).

In March 2009, when your account value fell below half of the principal, you had to overcome the fear of "am I going to lose all of this?" If you cannot overcome that fear and sell at the low, you end up worse off than a deposit.

A deposit offers low returns, but along the way there is no worry of losing principal. The choice differs by each person's risk tolerance. This service does not say which is better. It only shows both results using past data.

Calcúlalo tú mismo

Los resultados de arriba son estimaciones. Calcúlalos tú mismo con tus propias condiciones (importe, periodo, activo).

Compare it yourself in the asset-comparison simulator
#deposit comparison#S&P 500#recurring#20 years#risk-return

📋 Los resultados se basan en datos históricos; las rentabilidades pasadas no garantizan rentabilidades futuras.

📋 Este servicio se ofrece con fines educativos para ayudarte a entender la inversión, no como asesoramiento de inversión.