Parte del contenido detallado solo está disponible en coreano.

FX Effect4 min de lectura

Nominal vs. Real Exchange Rates

Does the number '1,300 won to a dollar' really show the true value of the won? Even at the same exchange rate, if U.S. prices and Korean prices differ, the amount of goods you can actually buy changes completely.

The Nominal Exchange Rate: That Number We See Every Day

The nominal exchange rate is the 'as-is ratio right now' at which two currencies are exchanged in the market. When the news says 'the won/dollar rate is 1,300 won,' this is exactly the nominal exchange rate.

It moves in real time according to supply and demand in the foreign-exchange market, and it's also what we encounter when we exchange currency. It's very intuitive. It's the price tag itself: how many won you need to exchange for one dollar.

But there's a trap here. The nominal exchange rate says nothing about 'how different the two countries' price levels are.' Even if the exchange rate is unchanged, if Korean prices rise much faster than U.S. prices, the goods you can buy in Korea with the same dollar gradually shrink.

The Real Exchange Rate: 'True Value' Adjusted for Prices

The real exchange rate is a value that reflects the two countries' price differences in the nominal exchange rate and adjusts it to a 'real purchasing power' basis. The basic formula used by the IMF and various economics textbooks is as follows.

Real exchange rate (RER) = nominal exchange rate (e) × foreign price level (P*) ÷ domestic price level (P)

In words, it expresses 'how many of our goods a foreign good can be exchanged for.' If the nominal exchange rate is simply the 'won-vs-dollar price tag,' then the real exchange rate is the 'real exchange ratio at which Korean goods and U.S. goods are swapped.'

So even if the nominal exchange rate is the same, if Korean prices rise more, the real exchange rate changes. Because prices are involved, the two indicators often move in different directions.

Depending on the direction of the formula (where you put domestic/foreign), the numerator/denominator notation can look different, but the core — 'adjusting the nominal exchange rate for prices' — is the same.

The Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER): Many Countries at Once

Korea doesn't trade only with the U.S. It deals with many countries — China, Japan, the EU, and more. That's where the 'effective exchange rate' comes in.

First, the nominal effective exchange rate (NEER) is the nominal exchange rate against major trading partners' currencies, weighted by trade share. And the real effective exchange rate (REER) reflects even the price differences on top of that.

REER is usually published as an index that sets a specific base point at 100. You interpret it like this.

① REER above 100 → the home currency is relatively overvalued compared with the base point ② REER below 100 → relatively undervalued

The reason the Bank of Korea and others watch REER is that it lets you comprehensively gauge how our exports' price competitiveness stands relative to trading partners. It's a picture you'd miss looking only at the nominal exchange rate.

REER shows 'relative over/undervaluation versus a base point'; it's a reference indicator, not a tool for predicting the future direction of the exchange rate.

Getting the Feel with the Big Mac Index

If the real exchange rate feels hard, the 'Big Mac Index' created by the British magazine The Economist in 1986 is a good analogy.

It's an indicator that compares how much a single Big Mac costs in each country to show, in a fun way, whether a currency is overvalued or undervalued. This leans on the concept of purchasing power parity (PPP), that 'the same good should cost about the same anywhere.'

For example, if a Big Mac is $5.58 in the U.S. and £4.19 in the U.K., the Big Mac-based 'implied exchange rate' is about 0.75. If the actual market rate were 0.78, you'd interpret it as the pound being slightly (about 3% in this example) undervalued.

Of course, the Big Mac isn't a perfect indicator, since ingredients, labor, and taxes differ by country. But it conveys very intuitively the core of the real exchange rate: 'you can't know true value from the nominal exchange rate alone; you must view it together with prices.'

The specific Big Mac prices and undervaluation rates change over time, so the numbers above are examples to explain the method. Don't read them as an assertion that a particular currency is over- or undervalued.

Why It Matters to Investors

When you invest in overseas assets, the return is determined by 'the change in asset price × the change in the exchange rate.' Even if a U.S. stock rises, if the dollar weakens against the won in the meantime, the return converted to won can shrink. In the opposite case, an FX gain can be added.

On top of this, one more layer: the real exchange rate tells you about the variable of 'prices.' It means that even if the nominal return is positive, the real purchasing power adjusted for inflation can differ. So in long-term investing, you must view not only the nominal return but also the FX effect and prices (purchasing power) together.

This article is not at all about telling you to buy or sell a particular currency or asset. Its aim is to view the 'hidden variables' of exchange rates and prices together, without hiding them. On 'The Return of Almost Everything,' you can directly simulate how the exchange rate affected the actual performance of overseas assets when converted to won, and how the result changes when you reflect prices (inflation).

Preguntas frecuentes

Q. Nominal vs. real exchange rate, summed up in one line?

The nominal exchange rate is the 'price tag at which two currencies are exchanged in the market right now,' and the real exchange rate is a value that reflects the two countries' price differences and adjusts it to a 'real purchasing power' basis. Think of the nominal rate as the number you see when exchanging currency, and the real rate as a value comparing 'the amount of goods you can actually buy.'

Q. If the REER is above 100, is that unconditionally bad?

You can't assert that. A REER above 100 is only a 'reference signal' that the home currency is relatively overvalued versus the base point; it isn't a value that decides good or bad. Overvaluation has two sides — it's favorable for buying imports cheaply but can burden export price competitiveness. It's also not a tool for predicting the future direction of the exchange rate.

Q. So do I have to predict the exchange rate when investing abroad?

The point of this article isn't to tell you to predict the exchange rate. Even experts find rates hard to get right. But since the exchange rate and prices are reflected as-is in the final performance of overseas assets, don't be fooled by the nominal return into thinking 'I earned this much'; check the FX effect, fees, and prices together.

📋 Los resultados se basan en datos históricos; las rentabilidades pasadas no garantizan rentabilidades futuras.

📋 Este servicio se ofrece con fines educativos para ayudarte a entender la inversión, no como asesoramiento de inversión.