Some detailed content is available in Korean only.

📚 Featured scenarios

Featured scenarios

Investing scenarios based on historical data, verified by the operator. We did not cherry-pick only the good results. Risk and loss duration are shown together.

All results are based on historical data and do not guarantee future returns.

Showing 48 of 48 scenarios

Long-term compoundingRecurring

S&P 500 ETF, 20 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $220 per month in an S&P 500 ETF starting in 2006?

#S&P 500#20 years#recurring

Annualized return of about 8.6% (XIRR)

Total invested

$53k

Final value

$284k

Cumulative return

+433%

Annualized (XIRR)

8.6% / yr

Maximum drawdown

-50.9%

Longest loss

36 months

Peak recovery

54 months

This is the result of continuing monthly investing for 20 years while enduring several large crashes such as the 2008 financial crisis and the 2020 COVID crash. The maximum drawdown during the period was -50.9%, and it took 54 months to recover the previous peak.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Long-term compoundingRecurring

KOSPI 200 ETF, 15 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $220 per month in a KOSPI 200 ETF starting in 2011?

#KOSPI 200#15 years#recurring

Annualized return of about 4.1% (XIRR)

Total invested

$40k

Final value

$75k

Cumulative return

+87%

Annualized (XIRR)

4.1% / yr

Maximum drawdown

-31.2%

Longest loss

28 months

Peak recovery

32 months

This case started investing just after the financial-crisis low. It recorded a lower return than the S&P 500. The Korean market has had many long sideways periods, so the long-term compounding effect appears relatively muted.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected)

Long-term compoundingRecurring

Samsung Electronics, 10 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $370 per month in Samsung Electronics starting in 2016?

#Samsung Electronics#10 years#recurring

Annualized return of about 3.8% (XIRR)

⚠️ This result is based on today's representative asset. Survivorship bias is present.

Total invested

$44k

Final value

$64k

Cumulative return

+45%

Annualized (XIRR)

3.8% / yr

Maximum drawdown

-42.1%

Longest loss

30 months

Peak recovery

38 months

This calculates what would have happened had you invested in the past in the company that is currently Korea's largest by market capitalization. Calculating past returns based on a company that is a large cap today can make results look better than they really were (survivorship bias).

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); survivorship bias present

Long-term compoundingRecurring

Bitcoin, 5 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $37 per week in Bitcoin starting in 2021?

#BTC#Bitcoin#5 years#recurring

Annualized return of about 36.4% (XIRR), but MDD of -80.1%

Total invested

$9.6k

Final value

$46k

Cumulative return

+377%

Annualized (XIRR)

36.4% / yr

Maximum drawdown

-80.1%

Longest loss

24 months

Peak recovery

30 months

Bitcoin recorded a high return, but its maximum drawdown reached -80.1%. This means you would have had to endure a period in which the asset's value fell 80% from its peak. There is no guarantee that past returns will repeat in the future.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); high-volatility asset; exchange fees not reflected

Worst-case startRecurring

Started Investing Right Before the Financial Crisis → Today

What if you had started investing about $220 per month at the S&P 500 peak in October 2007?

#S&P 500#financial crisis#worst start

+356% after 19 years, 54 months to recover

Total invested

$51k

Final value

$231k

Cumulative return

+356%

Annualized (XIRR)

9.2% / yr

Maximum drawdown

-51.3%

Longest loss

36 months

Peak recovery

54 months

Even if you had started investing just before the financial crisis, one of the worst historical entry points, continuing to invest for about 19 years produced a high return. However, you had to endure a -51.3% loss early on and a 54-month recovery period.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Investing through crashesRecurring

Staying Invested Through the COVID Crash

What if you had kept investing about $220 per month from just before the COVID crash in February 2020?

#S&P 500#COVID#recurring

+38% after 3 years vs. +12% if you stopped after the crash

Total invested

$8k

Final value

$11k

Cumulative return

+38%

Annualized (XIRR)

13.4% / yr

Maximum drawdown

-34.2%

Longest loss

5 months

Peak recovery

5 months

This compares the difference between continuing to invest through the COVID crash (+38%) and stopping investing (+12%). Recovering quickly from the short-term crash was the key benefit of staying invested.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Long-term compoundingRecurring

Nasdaq 100 ETF, 10 Years

What if you had invested about $220 per month in a Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) starting in 2014?

#QQQ#Nasdaq#10 years#recurring

Annualized return of about 18%

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Long-term compoundingRecurring

US Total-Market ETF, 15 Years

What if you had invested about $220 per month in VTI starting right after the 2009 financial crisis?

#VTI#total market#15 years

The power of starting right after the financial crisis

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Long-term compoundingRecurring

Gold (GLD), 20 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $220 per month in a gold ETF starting in 2004?

#GLD#gold#20 years

Long-term performance of an inflation-hedge asset

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Worst-case startLump-sum

Lump-Sum Nasdaq Investment at the Dotcom Bubble Peak

If you had invested about $7,400 at the Nasdaq peak in March 2000, when would it have recovered?

#QQQ#dotcom bubble#worst start

15 years to fully recover

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Worst-case startLump-sum

Lump-Sum S&P 500 Investment Just Before Black Monday

What if you had invested about $7,400 just before Black Monday in October 1987?

#SPY#Black Monday#1987

Recovered within 1 year, tripled after 10 years

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected. Note: SPY was listed in January 1993. The earlier period (1987–1993) is a hypothetical simulation based on S&P 500 index returns.

Worst-case startRecurring

Recurring Nasdaq Investing From the 2021 Peak

What if you had invested about $220 per month starting at the Nasdaq peak in November 2021?

#QQQ#rate shock#2022

Current status of recurring investing in a down market

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Investing through crashesRecurring

Continuing Recurring S&P 500 Investing Through the Financial Crisis

What if you had invested about $220 per month starting in 2007 and never stopped, even through the financial-crisis crash?

#SPY#financial crisis#recurring

The power of shares steadily accumulated after the crash

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Investing through crashesRecurring

Recurring S&P 500 Investing Through the COVID Crash

What if you had invested about $220 per month starting just before the COVID crash in February 2020?

#SPY#COVID#recurring

Fast recovery after passing through the crash

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Asset comparisonComparison

S&P 500 vs. Nasdaq 100, 10-Year Comparison

What if you had made recurring investments of the same amount in the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq 100 over the same period?

#SPY#QQQ#comparison

The choice between diversification and concentration

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Asset comparisonComparison

Stocks vs. Bonds vs. Gold: Diversified Investing

What if you had invested the same amount in each of SPY (stocks), TLT (bonds), and GLD (gold)?

#SPY#TLT#GLD#diversification

The effect of asset allocation

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Long-term compoundingRecurring

Microsoft, 10 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $220 per month in MSFT starting during its 2014 cloud pivot?

#MSFT#Microsoft#10 years#recurring

Compounding riding the cloud revolution

⚠️ This result is based on today's representative asset. Survivorship bias is present.

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected; survivorship bias present

Long-term compoundingRecurring

Nvidia, 5 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $220 per month in NVDA starting just before the AI boom in 2019?

#NVDA#Nvidia#5 years#recurring#AI

Benefiting from the AI era

⚠️ This result is based on today's representative asset. Survivorship bias is present.

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected; survivorship bias present

Long-term compoundingRecurring

Berkshire Hathaway, 20 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $220 per month in BRK-B starting in 2004?

#BRK-B#Berkshire#20 years#recurring

Alongside Warren Buffett

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Long-term compoundingRecurring

US REIT ETF, 15 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $220 per month in VNQ (US real-estate REIT ETF) starting in 2009?

#VNQ#REIT#real estate#15 years#recurring

Compounding of dividend-plus-growth REITs

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Long-term compoundingRecurring

KODEX 200, 20 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $220 per month in KODEX 200 starting in 2004?

#KODEX 200#KOSPI#20 years#recurring#Korea

The truth about 20 years of the KOSPI

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected)

Long-term compoundingRecurring

Samsung Electronics, 20 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $220 per month in Samsung Electronics starting in 2004?

#Samsung Electronics#005930#20 years#recurring#semiconductors

Beyond the semiconductor cycle

⚠️ This result is based on today's representative asset. Survivorship bias is present.

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); survivorship bias present

Worst-case startLump-sum

Lump-Sum at the Nasdaq Peak, Held for 10 Years

What if you had put in about $7,400 at the historic Nasdaq peak on March 10, 2000, and held on for 10 years?

#QQQ#dotcom bubble#worst start#lump-sum

Principal still not recovered even after 10 years

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Worst-case startLump-sum

Lump-Sum at the KOSPI Peak (Just Before the Financial Crisis)

What if you had invested about $7,400 at the historic KOSPI peak on October 31, 2007?

#KODEX 200#financial crisis#KOSPI#peak#lump-sum

The Korean market peak just before the financial crisis

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected)

Worst-case startLump-sum

Lump-Sum Bitcoin at the 2021 Peak

What if you had invested about $7,400 at Bitcoin's historic peak on November 8, 2021?

#BTC-USD#Bitcoin#peak#crypto#lump-sum

The reality of buying crypto at the peak

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); exchange fees not reflected; high-volatility asset

Worst-case startLump-sum

Lump-Sum Bond Investment Just Before Rate Hikes

What if you had invested about $7,400 in a long-term bond ETF (TLT) at the rate low in August 2020?

#TLT#bonds#rate hikes#lump-sum

Even bonds can be cut in half

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Investing through crashesRecurring

Continuing Recurring Nasdaq Investing Through the Dotcom Collapse

What if you had invested about $220 per month in QQQ for 10 years starting right after the March 2000 collapse began?

#QQQ#dotcom bubble#recurring#crash

What is the result after 10 years?

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Investing through crashesRecurring

Continuing Recurring Investing Through the 2022 Rate Shock

What if you had invested about $220 per month in QQQ starting just before the January 2022 downturn began?

#QQQ#rate hikes#2022#recurring#down market

Where an investor who passed through the down market stands now

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Investing through crashesRecurring

Recurring US Total-Market Investing Through the Oil Shock and Stagflation

What if you had invested about $220 per month in the US total market (VTI proxy) for 10 years starting right after the 1973 oil shock?

#VTI#oil shock#stagflation#1970s#recurring

Compounding that overcame even stagflation

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected. Note: VTI was listed in May 2001. The earlier period (1973–2001) is a hypothetical simulation based on US total-market index returns.

Asset comparisonComparison

Korea vs. US ETF Comparison

What if you had invested about $220 per month in each of KODEX 200 and SPY starting in 2010?

#KODEX 200#SPY#Korea#US#comparison

The long-term performance gap between domestic and overseas

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Asset comparisonComparison

Growth Stocks vs. Value Stocks Comparison

What if you had invested about $220 per month in each of QQQ (growth) and VTV (value) starting in 2010?

#QQQ#VTV#growth stocks#value stocks#comparison

Growth vs. value: which had the edge

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Asset comparisonComparison

Gold vs. Bitcoin Comparison

What if you had invested about $220 per month in each of GLD (gold) and BTC-USD (Bitcoin) starting in 2015?

#GLD#BTC-USD#gold#Bitcoin#comparison

Traditional safe-haven asset vs. digital asset

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected; BTC is a high-volatility asset

Asset comparisonComparison

Dividend Stocks vs. Growth Stocks Comparison

What if you had invested about $220 per month in each of VYM (dividend) and QQQ (growth) starting in 2014?

#VYM#QQQ#dividend stocks#growth stocks#comparison

Dividend income vs. capital gains — which after 10 years?

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Long-term compoundingRecurring

Nasdaq 100 ETF, 15 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $220 per month in a Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) starting in 2011?

#QQQ#Nasdaq 100#15 years#recurring

Annualized return of about 16% (estimate), MDD -35%

Total invested

$40k

Final value

$378k

Cumulative return

+844%

Annualized (XIRR)

16.1% / yr (estimate)

Maximum drawdown

-35.1%

Longest loss

26 months

Peak recovery

28 months

This is the estimated result of recurring purchases of the Nasdaq 100 over 15 years. You had to endure a drawdown of more than -35% in the 2022 down market, but the subsequent recovery produced a high cumulative return. Figures are estimates and may differ from actual calculation results.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected. Figures are estimates.

Long-term compoundingRecurring

US Dividend-Growth ETF, 10 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $220 per month in a dividend-growth ETF (SCHD) starting in 2016, with dividends reinvested?

#SCHD#dividend growth#10 years#recurring#dividend reinvestment

Includes the compounding effect of dividend reinvestment (estimate)

Total invested

$27k

Final value

$46k

Cumulative return

+72%

Annualized (XIRR)

7.8% / yr (estimate)

Maximum drawdown

-28.4%

Longest loss

18 months

Peak recovery

22 months

This is the estimated result of making recurring purchases of a dividend-growth ETF for 10 years while reinvesting dividends. The return is lower than growth stocks, but dividend income acts as a cushion during market declines. Figures are estimates and may differ from actual calculation results.

Based on adjusted close (dividends, splits, and dividend reinvestment reflected); FX effect not reflected. Figures are estimates.

Long-term compoundingRecurring

Gold ETF, 10 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $150 per month in a gold ETF (GLD) starting in 2016, from an inflation-hedge perspective?

#GLD#gold#10 years#recurring#inflation hedge

10-year performance of an inflation-hedge asset (estimate)

Total invested

$18k

Final value

$33k

Cumulative return

+88%

Annualized (XIRR)

7.2% / yr (estimate)

Maximum drawdown

-18.9%

Longest loss

20 months

Peak recovery

24 months

Gold has a lower return than stocks but a smaller maximum drawdown, so it serves as a volatility cushion. Its price rose sharply during the 2020–2022 inflation period. Figures are estimates and may differ from actual calculation results.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected. Figures are estimates.

Long-term compoundingRecurring

Ethereum, 3 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $37 per week in Ethereum (ETH) starting in 2022? A high-volatility asset.

#ETH#Ethereum#3 years#recurring#crypto#high volatility

Result of dollar-cost averaging amid high volatility (estimate), MDD over -70%

Total invested

$5.8k

Final value

$8.1k

Cumulative return

+41%

Annualized (XIRR)

12.5% / yr (estimate)

Maximum drawdown

-72.3%

Longest loss

18 months

Peak recovery

22 months

Ethereum is more volatile than Bitcoin, and its maximum drawdown exceeded -72%. Dollar-cost averaging lowered the average cost, but enduring a drawdown of this magnitude psychologically is extremely difficult. Figures are estimates.

Based on adjusted close; exchange fees not reflected; high-volatility asset. Figures are estimates.

Long-term compoundingRecurring

Korean Bond ETF, 10 Years of Recurring Investing

What if you had invested about $150 per month in a Korean government-bond ETF starting in 2016? A safe-asset baseline.

#KOSEF Treasury Bond#bonds#10 years#recurring#safe asset

The actual long-term return of a safe asset (estimate)

Total invested

$18k

Final value

$21k

Cumulative return

+17%

Annualized (XIRR)

1.6% / yr (estimate)

Maximum drawdown

-12.3%

Longest loss

14 months

Peak recovery

18 months

The Korean government-bond ETF is a safe asset, but the 2022 rate-hike shock produced a loss period. Its annual return is in the 1% range, which may fall short of the inflation rate. Figures are estimates.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected). Figures are estimates.

Worst-case startRecurring

Recurring Nasdaq Investing Just Before the Dotcom Bubble

What if you had started investing about $220 per month for 15 years at the Nasdaq peak in March 2000?

#QQQ#Nasdaq#dotcom bubble#worst start#recurring

A 15-year recovery — the power of steady recurring investing (estimate)

Total invested

$40k

Final value

$53k

Cumulative return

+33%

Annualized (XIRR)

2.0% / yr (estimate)

Maximum drawdown

-81.4%

Longest loss

72 months

Peak recovery

84 months

Even if you had started recurring investing at the dotcom bubble peak, continuing for 15 years ultimately produced a profit. However, a maximum drawdown of -81% and a 72-month (6-year) loss period are extremely hard to endure. Figures are estimates.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected. Figures are estimates.

Worst-case startRecurring

Recurring Japanese-Stock Investing Just Before the Japan Bubble

What if you had started investing about $220 per month at the historic peak of the Japanese market in late 1989?

#Japan#bubble#lost 30 years#worst start#recurring

The lost 30 years — an extreme case of buying at the peak (estimate)

Total invested

$83k

Final value

$73k

Cumulative return

-12%

Annualized (XIRR)

-0.4% / yr (estimate)

Maximum drawdown

-65.2%

Longest loss

180 months

Peak recovery

Not yet recovered

The collapse of the Japanese bubble is a leading example showing that even long-term investing can result in a loss. Even after 31 years of recurring investing, the value stayed below the principal. Not all assets trend upward over the long run. Figures are estimates.

Based on adjusted close (EWJ ETF basis, FX effect not reflected). EWJ was listed in 1996; the earlier period is a hypothetical simulation based on Japan's TOPIX. Figures are estimates.

Worst-case startRecurring

Recurring Investing From the 2021 Bitcoin Peak

What if you had started investing about $37 per week at Bitcoin's all-time high in November 2021?

#BTC-USD#Bitcoin#2021#peak#recurring

Crypto DCA from the peak — the current scorecard (estimate)

Total invested

$9k

Final value

$21k

Cumulative return

+130%

Annualized (XIRR)

22.1% / yr (estimate)

Maximum drawdown

-76.5%

Longest loss

24 months

Peak recovery

30 months

Even if you started at the peak, buying periodically lowers the average cost, so a profit appears after recovery. However, enduring a -76% drawdown is the extreme difficulty specific to Bitcoin. Figures are estimates.

Based on adjusted close; exchange fees not reflected; high-volatility asset. Figures are estimates.

Investing through crashesRecurring

Concentrated S&P 500 Buying During the COVID Crash

What if you had concentrated about $370 per month into the S&P 500 for 1 year starting when the crash began in February 2020?

#SPY#COVID#concentrated buying#crash#recurring

Result of 1 year of concentrated buying during the crash (estimate)

Total invested

$4.4k

Final value

$6.7k

Cumulative return

+52%

Annualized (XIRR)

47.5% / yr (estimate)

Maximum drawdown

-34.1%

Longest loss

2 months

Peak recovery

5 months

This is the estimated result of concentrated buying for 1 year right after the COVID crash. As the S&P 500 recovered quickly, it produced a high return in a short period. There is no guarantee that every crisis will recover this quickly afterward. Figures are estimates.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected. Figures are estimates.

Investing through crashesRecurring

Concentrated Buying at the Financial-Crisis Low

What if you had concentrated about $220 per month into the S&P 500 for 2 years starting at the financial-crisis low in March 2009?

#SPY#financial crisis#concentrated buying#low#recurring

Result of 2 years of buying at the financial-crisis low (estimate)

Total invested

$5.3k

Final value

$8.5k

Cumulative return

+60%

Annualized (XIRR)

27.3% / yr (estimate)

Maximum drawdown

-15.8%

Longest loss

6 months

Peak recovery

8 months

This is the estimated result of buying for 2 years right after the financial-crisis low. Averaging in at the low can lead to high returns during the subsequent rebound. However, knowing the exact low is only possible in hindsight. Figures are estimates.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected. Figures are estimates.

Investing through crashesRecurring

Recurring Investing Right After the Dotcom Bubble Collapse

What if you had invested about $220 per month in the S&P 500 starting at the dotcom-bubble low in October 2002?

#SPY#dotcom bubble#after the low#recurring

Result of 5 years of investing right after the dotcom collapse (estimate)

Total invested

$13k

Final value

$22k

Cumulative return

+64%

Annualized (XIRR)

10.7% / yr (estimate)

Maximum drawdown

-7.2%

Longest loss

3 months

Peak recovery

4 months

Had you started recurring investing at the low right after the dotcom bubble collapsed, you would have recorded a solid return over 5 years. The year 2007 was a time when the financial crisis was about to strike, but this 5-year window was a bull market. Figures are estimates.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected. Figures are estimates.

Asset comparisonComparison

S&P 500 vs. Nasdaq 100 vs. Dow Jones, 10 Years

What if you had invested about $220 per month in each of SPY, QQQ, and DIA starting in 2014?

#SPY#QQQ#DIA#S&P 500#Nasdaq#Dow#comparison

Diversification vs. concentration vs. tradition — 10-year performance comparison

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Asset comparisonComparison

US Stocks vs. Gold vs. Bonds, 15-Year Comparison

What if you had invested about $220 per month in each of SPY (US stocks), GLD (gold), and TLT (bonds) starting in 2009?

#SPY#GLD#TLT#stocks#gold#bonds#asset allocation#comparison

15-year performance comparison of stocks, gold, and bonds

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); FX effect not reflected

Asset comparisonComparison

Korea vs. US vs. Global ETF Comparison

What if you had invested about $220 per month in each of KODEX 200 (Korea), SPY (US), and VT (global) starting in 2011?

#KODEX 200#SPY#VT#Korea#US#global#comparison

A three-way long-term performance contest: domestic, US, and global

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close (dividends and splits reflected); KODEX 200 FX effect not reflected; SPY and VT are on a USD basis

Asset comparisonComparison

S&P 500 vs. Bitcoin, 5-Year Comparison

What if you had invested about $150 per month in each of SPY (S&P 500) and BTC-USD (Bitcoin) starting in 2019?

#SPY#BTC-USD#S&P 500#Bitcoin#comparison

5-year performance of a traditional asset vs. a digital asset

Actual figures are provided in real time by the calculation engine. Press the “Try this scenario” button to see the result.

Based on adjusted close; BTC exchange fees not reflected; high-volatility asset; FX effect not reflected

How scenarios are selected

Featured scenarios are not investment advice. They were selected to show what long-term investing actually looks like. To avoid showing only the good results, we included worst-case starting points and crash-period scenarios. All results are based on historical data and do not predict future outcomes.

📋 Results are based on historical data; past returns do not guarantee future returns.

📋 This service is provided for educational purposes to help you understand investing, not as investment advice.