一部の詳細コンテンツは韓国語のみでご利用いただけます。

Asset Classes6 分で読めます

The Mechanics and Risks of Short Selling — The Possibility of Unlimited Loss

'Buy low, sell high' is common sense for stocks. Short selling reverses the order: 'sell when high (having borrowed), buy back to return when cheap.' But this order flips the risk.

What Is Short Selling

Short selling is a trade that bets on a stock price decline. The order goes like this.

(1) Borrow someone else's stock (a securities loan). (2) Sell it in the market now. (3) Later, when the price falls, buy it back cheap. (4) Return the repurchased stock and keep the difference.

For example, if you borrow and sell at about $74 and buy back to return at about $52, the gain is about $22 (excluding fees and costs). It's a structure that profits the more the price falls.

To short, you must first borrow the stock, so a securities loan and a lending fee always come attached.

Why There Is No Cap on Losses

The most important feature of short selling is that there is no cap on losses.

With an ordinary purchase, at worst the price goes to 0 and -100% is the limit. You lose only the money you put in.

But short selling is the opposite. In theory a stock price can rise infinitely. If you sold at about $74 and it becomes $220 or $370, you have to buy it back at that price to return it, so losses can swell to several times your principal.

In other words, it's an asymmetric structure of 'limited profit (down to a price of 0), unlimited loss.' It is the exact opposite shape to the risk of buying.

Short selling has, in theory, no cap on losses because a stock price can rise infinitely. By contrast, the maximum loss on an ordinary purchase is capped at -100%. This asymmetry is the intrinsic risk of short selling.

Short Squeeze — GameStop in 2021

The classic case where unlimited loss became reality is the GameStop (GME) episode of January 2021.

Several hedge funds bet on a GME decline through short selling, but when retail investors banded together online and bought the stock en masse, the price surged. GME jumped about 400% in a single week in January, and about 1,625% from the start of the year.

The short sellers rushed to buy back the rising stock (short covering) to stem losses, but that buying pushed the price even higher, producing a 'short squeeze.' Notably, Melvin Capital lost about -53% in the single month of January (its roughly $12.5 billion of assets under management at the start of the year plunged, with $2.75 billion injected from outside).

GameStop's 'about +400% in one week in January, about +1,625% from the start of the year' and 'Melvin Capital's about -53% loss in January, about $12.5 billion in assets under management' were cross-checked against CNBC and FXStreet reporting.

Short Selling Is Necessary for Markets but Extremely Dangerous for Individuals

Short selling has a positive function of deflating bubbles in overvalued assets and aiding price discovery. That is why it is institutionally permitted.

But for individuals it is very dangerous, with unlimited loss, lending fees, short squeeze risk, and repayment pressure all combined. In Korea, individual access to short selling is limited, and it has been temporarily banned in the past during periods of sharp market swings.

This service looks at 'if you hold good assets for a long time, how much?' The first step is to clearly understand that short selling is a short, dangerous bet on a decline on the opposite side of that.

よくある質問

Q. What is the maximum amount I can lose short selling?

In theory there is no limit. Because a stock price can rise infinitely, the burden of buying it back to return it can also grow infinitely. It is the exact opposite of an ordinary purchase, whose maximum loss is fixed at -100% (a price of 0). If you shorted a stock that surges like GameStop, losses can be several times your principal.

Q. Is short selling a bad thing that should be banned?

Short selling has a positive function of correcting overvaluation and aiding price discovery, so it is institutionally permitted in most markets. That said, it is sometimes temporarily banned out of concern that it encourages panic selling during sharp market declines. Rather than 'good/bad,' what matters is understanding that it carries a large structural risk of unlimited loss for individual investors.

📋 結果は過去のデータに基づくものです。過去のリターンは将来のリターンを保証しません。

📋 本サービスは投資アドバイスではなく、投資を理解するための教育目的で提供されています。