Some detailed content is available in Korean only.

Gold: lump-sum vs 15-year DCA — which won?

Comparing lump-sum and 15-year DCA in gold, a low-volatility asset, shows neither method is always right, and the path of the period decides the result.

Investment conditions

Asset · Gold (GLD)

Method · Comparison

A lump sum puts everything in early and fully captures the rise in an uptrend afterward, but if prices fall right after entry, it carries that drawdown in full. DCA spreads purchases across dates to average the cost, but it may load less into a segment that rose later. In a stretch where volatility is relatively low and the long-term trend is up, like gold's, lump-sum sometimes leads, yet where a long correction followed entry, DCA cushioned the drawdown. Neither method is always favorable, and each carries a different drawdown and underwater period to endure.

Open in comparison calculator

Why this period and asset

July 2011 found gold at a high level after a multi-year surge. Gold then corrected and drifted for several years before turning higher again from 2019. Over this 15-year span, gold was less abrupt than stocks but still went through several declines and recoveries. It is a case of how the choice of method makes a difference even in gold, often called a safe-haven asset.

Caveats & limits

This comparison is a simplified simulation that ignores taxes, trading fees, and currency effects, and it depends on one specific start and end date. Both methods have a maximum drawdown and an underwater period, and neither is recommended. Gold trades in dollars, so the felt gain or loss shifts with the exchange rate, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

Data sources & limits

  • Trading fees and taxes are not reflected — figures are pre-tax.
  • Based on historical data; does not guarantee future returns.

Frequently asked questions

Gold is a safe-haven, so it has no drawdown?

No. Gold had multi-year decline phases and spent time underwater. It is merely less volatile than stocks; that does not mean it has no drawdown.

So is a lump sum always better?

It depends on the period. In a long uptrend, lump-sum tends to lead, but where a long correction followed entry, DCA cushioned the drawdown.

Which method should I choose?

This material recommends neither. Each method carries a different drawdown and underwater period, so it matters to check the honest drawdown and judge based on your own situation.

Related scenarios

📋 Results are based on historical data; past returns do not guarantee future returns.

📋 This service is provided for educational purposes to help you understand investing, not as investment advice.

⚠️ Volatility and risk levels differ by asset, so returns alone cannot determine which is better.