Some detailed content is available in Korean only.

📖 Investment stories

Deposits vs. stocks: a 20-year gap

This compares the estimated results of a 3%-a-year deposit and an S&P 500 ETF when investing about $370 every month for 20 years. See the difference in volatility and opportunity cost for yourself.

Investment conditions summary

Period

Jan 2006 – Jan 2026 (20 years)

Amount

about $370 / month

Asset

3%/yr deposit vs. S&P 500 ETF (USD basis)

Method

Paid in at each month-end

⚠️ All results below are estimates based on past data and are shown pre-tax. Reflecting fees, exchange rates, and taxes may make actual results differ.

Total principal paid in

about $89k

20 years × 12 months × ~$370

Deposit estimated result (after-tax approx.)

about $121k

~3%/yr simple/compound approximation, interest-income tax applied

S&P 500 estimated result (estimate, pre-tax)

about $333k

FX effect not reflected, pre-tax, fees not reflected (estimate)

Difference between the two (pre-tax basis)

about $212k difference

The S&P 500 after-tax result is lower

MDD

Maximum drawdown period: Oct 2007 – Mar 2009

-56.8% (S&P 500 basis)

About 52 months to recover

The key test of the 20-year S&P 500 investment. Whether you stayed invested through this stretch decides the 20-year result. The deposit's principal was protected even during this period.

Deposits vs. stocks: the difference in numbers

Assuming you pay in about $370 every month for 20 years, the total principal is about $89k.

A 3%-a-year deposit (compounded) is estimated at around $121k. That is about $32k of gain over the principal, but it shrinks further once interest-income tax is paid.

Had you made recurring investments in an S&P 500 ETF, the estimated final amount is about $333k (pre-tax, FX effect not reflected). On a pre-tax basis, that is about $212k more than the deposit.

But this comparison assumes you endured the -56.8% (financial crisis) and -33.9% (COVID) crashes over the S&P 500's 20-year journey. A deposit has none of that fear.

Enduring volatility is the precondition

That the stock result is far larger than the deposit is clear from simple numbers. But to actually experience that difference, you had to endure countless bouts of volatility, including two big crashes (the 2008 financial crisis and the 2020 COVID crash).

In March 2009, when your account value fell below half of the principal, you had to overcome the fear of "am I going to lose all of this?" If you cannot overcome that fear and sell at the low, you end up worse off than a deposit.

A deposit offers low returns, but along the way there is no worry of losing principal. The choice differs by each person's risk tolerance. This service does not say which is better. It only shows both results using past data.

Calculate it yourself

The results above are estimates. Calculate them yourself with your own conditions (amount, period, asset).

Compare it yourself in the asset-comparison simulator
#deposit comparison#S&P 500#recurring#20 years#risk-return

📋 Results are based on historical data; past returns do not guarantee future returns.

📋 This service is provided for educational purposes to help you understand investing, not as investment advice.